Rebrand the product to rebrand the customer
Most organizations set out to change behavior. The deeper move is to change identity. People defend identities far longer than they defend habits.
Behavior is the surface.
Behavior is what an organization can see, so it is what most organizations try to manage. Discounts, reminders, friction, incentives. These move behavior for a while, then it returns to baseline. The reason is plain. The conditions changed. The person did not.
Identity is the layer underneath.
People hold behaviors loosely and identities tightly. Someone who decides he is a non-smoker quits more reliably than someone trying to smoke less, because the behavior now contradicts who he believes he is. Change the self-image and behavior follows, because it finally has a reason to last.
So you rebrand the product to rebrand the customer.
A brand can hand a customer a more capable version of themselves and let the product stand as proof. Harley-Davidson does not sell transportation. It sells membership in a kind of person, and the motorcycle is the evidence. Patagonia sells a way of belonging to people who take the outdoors and its protection seriously. The customer adopts the identity. The product carries it.
This is upstream work, not a slogan.
Rebranding the customer means deciding who the product helps them become, then aligning the name, the language, the experience and the community around that becoming. It changes what gets built, not only what gets said. Done well, the customer cannot leave the product without leaving a piece of who they have become.
People defend identities far longer than they defend habits.
The strategic implication.
If you want behavior that lasts, do not start with the behavior. Start with the identity that makes the behavior make sense. The organizations that keep customers for years have usually given them a self worth keeping.
Seen in the work
Frontline21 moved accountability from something done to a man after he failed into an identity a man steps into beforehand. The behavior followed the identity, and engagement rose because the relationship was no longer built on his worst moment.