Workstream 03 · Website Strategy

The site should answer the question the customer is actually asking.

The website was the conversion crossroads of the Radiant brand, where category positioning, customer trust, product clarity and signup intent all had to meet. Less a website redesign than the redesign of the brand's most important conversion touchpoint.

Enter the exhibit

The redesigned conversion system, preserved as a navigable exhibit inside JasonWalker.design.

View the Website Experience

National Attention, A Conversion Gap

The launch worked. The website was the bottleneck.

Radiant launched into significant national attention: more than 80 news stories, coverage across 27 countries, real controversy, and a surge of traffic to the site. The product was differentiated and the audience was unusually aligned. The decision, though, happened on the website, and that is where the opportunity narrowed.

20,000

Website visitors

144

New subscribers

0.72%

Visitor to subscriber

The opportunity gap · at 20,000 visitors

0.72% · today144 subscribers
1.5% conversion300 subscribers
2.0% conversion400 subscribers

Not catastrophic. Not optimized.

For a mobile carrier, 0.72% is not a disaster. Switching is a high-friction decision. But against national PR and strong audience alignment, moving the path toward 1 or 2 percent was a plausible, meaningful gain. Without deeper funnel data the exact drop-off is impossible to isolate, and signup friction may share the blame. The numbers still made one thing clear: the site had to reduce friction faster and give a stronger reason to switch.

The Strategic Problem

The conversion battle was "why switch," not "what is it."

The site I inherited answered one of the customer's two questions well, and the other poorly. It was strong at "What is Radiant?" and weak at "Why is switching worth the hassle today?" For a telecom product, the second question is the conversion battle.

Switching carriers is hard before a website says anything. A customer has to overcome real friction:

Switching anxietyDevice questionsPlan comparison Carrier lock-in habitsPort-out PINActivation concernsTrust questions

The inherited site made that friction worse instead of compressing it:

It asked customers to work too hard.

Too much scrolling.

Pricing buried.

Too many competing calls to action.

Differentiation buried.

No compression from curiosity to confidence to action.

Radiant's only winnable ground was telecalm: intentional technology, peace, protection, a calmer relationship with devices. Those are outcomes, not features, and they were the only terms on which Radiant could win. This is the thesis of Category Positioning, carried into culture by Chaos Not Included. The website is where that belief had to reduce friction and earn the switch.

The Sales-Letter Journey

Not old vs new. Value exhibition vs decision architecture.

The inherited homepage tried to show everything at once: value, controversy, features, partnerships and programs, all before organizing the customer's decision. The prototype reorganized the page as a sequential sales letter. Open with the desired future, define the problem, build trust in the mechanism, make the decision easy, then narrow toward action.

Section 1

First Impression

Old: Radiant leads with itself: the first Christian carrier, the controversy, the media attention, the anti-porn messaging. New: the prototype leads with the customer's desired future, a calmer, safer, more intentional digital life.

Strategic shift · company-first introduction → customer-first transformation

Section 2

Differentiation

Old: coverage, the T-Mobile network, the Compax partnership, 5G, talk, text, data, keep your number. New: differentiation becomes meaning. Radiant is structure where chaos used to be.

Strategic shift · feature stack → reason to believe

Section 3

Trust

Old: the customer reaches plans before the mechanism is understood, and switching depends on a video. New: the prototype explains how protection works before asking for the purchase decision.

Strategic shift · information burden → confidence building

Section 4

Plans

Old: plans arrive in heavy typography with low scanability. New: plans become clear decision options inside a calmer hierarchy.

Strategic shift · plan exposure → decision facilitation

Section 5

Features Comparison

Old: programs, incentives, partnerships and movement language compete for attention, and the customer is offered incentives before understanding the filtering mechanism. New: the filtering system becomes visible and understandable. Customers can explore what Radiant blocks and how protection is structured before being asked to join.

Strategic shift · promotional incentives → feature comprehension

Redesign Principles

What guided every decision.

Answer customer questions first.

Differentiate before persuading.

Reduce friction before increasing traffic.

Show difference, don't claim it.

Clarity creates trust.

Fewer choices create momentum.

Where this sits

The bridge between belief and action.

Relationship to Category Positioning. The website is where the category reframe stops being an argument and becomes something a visitor can feel. Positioning sets the claim; the site has to make it legible in seconds.

Relationship to Signup & Onboarding. The site's job ends at the decision. The signup and onboarding work begins the moment the visitor says yes. The two were designed to hand off without a seam.

Website strategy is the bridge between belief and action.

Next · Radiant Mobile

Signup & Onboarding

Return to the Radiant Mobile engagement